What Manu is not
Manu connects the calendar, documents and follow-up in Théra. Its AI features prepare drafts and exercise suggestions; they do not replace clinical examination, programme selection or the practitioner’s review.
- Manu helps with formatting and structure.
- The practitioner retains analysis, decision-making and approval.
- Content may need correction, additions or removal.
- Clinical and documentation responsibility does not transfer to the tool.
The main limitations
A useful reference for a practitioner, practice or patient who wants to understand the tool’s precise role.
Manu does not make a diagnosis
It can help structure information or working hypotheses, but it never replaces clinical examination, interpretation or the practitioner’s decision.
Manu does not replace the practitioner
Care, the therapeutic relationship, decisions and responsibility remain with the healthcare professional.
Manu does not remove the need for review
The aim is to save time and improve structure, not to produce a document for use without checking it.
What Manu does provide
Practical uses, from session preparation to patient follow-up.
Structure
Organise the case history, summary, clinical report and treatment plan in a more readable format.
Suggest
Suggest exercises or a programme based on the clinical report, for review and adaptation to the patient before sharing.
Speed up approval
Reduce time spent drafting from scratch while retaining a final check by the practitioner.
A suggested programme needs personalisation.
The clinical report provides context; it does not replace your assessment.
Check the proposed exercises, their suitability, instructions, frequency and progression. Consider the examination, the patient’s goals and their circumstances. In Théra, programme responses complement discussion; they do not constitute emergency monitoring.
See how to prepare the programmeWhat the cited studies allow us to say.
A publication can inform a use case; it does not automatically measure Manu’s outcomes.
The documentation-time, adherence and dropout figures shown on the site come from external studies. Their populations, durations and tools are stated alongside the sources. They do not guarantee individual gains or constitute clinical validation specific to Manu or Théra.
Understand the method and evidenceFor practices
Three simple questions to ask before use.
Related supporting information
Explore further with clarity.
FAQ
Useful limits to know before use.
Does Manu replace the practitioner?
No. Manu helps structure and draft, but the practitioner retains analysis, decision-making and final approval.
Can an output be used without reviewing it?
No. Review and final adjustment remain necessary before export or archiving.
Does Manu make a diagnosis?
No. It does not replace the professional’s clinical judgement or examination.
Why have a dedicated page about limitations?
Because a credible tool also clearly explains what it does not do, especially in a healthcare-related context.
Need a clear framework for your practice?
We can show you the method, system limits and documents useful for your internal assessment.